California Trial Targets Social Media Addiction Claims (Full Transcript)

A landmark case challenges major platforms over alleged addictive algorithms and youth mental health harms, with executive testimony and internal documents expected.
Download Transcript (DOCX)
Speakers
add Add new speaker

[00:00:00] Speaker 1: In California, jury selection begins later today in a landmark trial of social media companies. The tech giants are accused of causing addiction and mental health problems with their products in a case that could have wide-ranging implications. Our tech correspondent, Lily Jamali, reports.

[00:00:17] Speaker 2: Platforms like TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram are where billions of users around the world go to be entertained, informed, and to stay connected. But there's a dark side, according to lawyers for an alleged victim identified by her initials, KGM.

[00:00:32] Speaker 3: KGM is a young woman who got on social media at the age of eight and sustained a social media addiction that had a very negative effect on her emotional and psychological well-being.

[00:00:47] Speaker 2: And he says she's not alone in finding herself addicted to social media.

[00:00:51] Speaker 3: Unfortunately, there are all too many kids in the United States and in the UK and around the world who are suffering as KGM does because of the dangerous and addictive algorithms.

[00:01:02] Speaker 2: Attorneys say the trial starting Tuesday marks the first time in history that social media companies have ever been held to account by a jury in a court of law anywhere in the world. For years, the companies that run Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, and YouTube have successfully used a 26-word legal provision from 1996 before social media even existed as a legal shield. They've argued it means they're not responsible for what users post to their platforms. These cases will examine how the companies design their platforms, relying on company documents to show how they kept users scrolling, sometimes with catastrophic consequences.

[00:01:43] Speaker 4: So a lot of what these companies have been trying to shield from the public is likely going to be aired in court, and that is also significant.

[00:01:52] Speaker 2: Executives like Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg are also set to take the stand. He's defended his company on this issue in the past.

[00:02:00] Speaker 5: They're not often good under pressure when they have to answer questions about what did you know and when did you know it, why did you continue to do this particular harmful practice when you knew it was causing harm.

[00:02:12] Speaker 2: CAP CEO Evan Spiegel was also set to testify until last week when his company settled. The trial comes as platforms come under increased scrutiny from families, school districts, and prosecutors.

[00:02:24] Speaker 6: There's a question about should these companies even exist, and I'm a fan of them. I think they do a lot of good. They definitely don't come for free. They cause harm as well.

[00:02:33] Speaker 2: It'll now be up to a jury to decide whether they're at fault for those harms. Samali, BBC News, San Francisco.

ai AI Insights
Arow Summary
Jury selection begins in California for a landmark trial accusing major social media platforms (TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Snapchat) of designing addictive products that harm young users’ mental health. Plaintiffs cite a victim identified as KGM, who allegedly became addicted from age eight, and argue companies used dangerous algorithms to keep users scrolling despite known harms. The case challenges platforms’ long-standing reliance on a 1996 legal shield (Section 230) and is expected to reveal internal documents and feature testimony from executives including Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg; Snap’s CEO is no longer expected after a settlement. The outcome could set significant precedents for accountability of social media design choices.
Arow Title
Landmark Trial Puts Social Media Algorithms on the Stand
Arow Keywords
California Remove
jury selection Remove
landmark trial Remove
social media companies Remove
TikTok Remove
YouTube Remove
Instagram Remove
Snapchat Remove
Meta Remove
Mark Zuckerberg Remove
Section 230 Remove
algorithms Remove
addiction Remove
mental health Remove
youth safety Remove
platform design Remove
internal documents Remove
accountability Remove
settlement Remove
Evan Spiegel Remove
Arow Key Takeaways
  • A California trial may be the first to have a jury assess social media companies’ liability for addictive platform design.
  • Plaintiffs argue recommendation algorithms were engineered to maximize engagement, contributing to youth addiction and mental health harm.
  • The case may narrow or bypass traditional Section 230 defenses by focusing on product design rather than user-generated content.
  • Internal company documents and executive testimony (including Mark Zuckerberg) could become public and influential.
  • Snap settled ahead of trial, highlighting legal and reputational risks for platforms.
  • The verdict could have broad implications for regulation, litigation, and how platforms design and moderate features for minors.
Arow Sentiments
Neutral: The report balances criticism of alleged addictive, harmful design with acknowledgment that platforms provide benefits; the tone is investigative and anticipatory about legal scrutiny and potential accountability.
Arow Enter your query
{{ secondsToHumanTime(time) }}
Back
Forward
{{ Math.round(speed * 100) / 100 }}x
{{ secondsToHumanTime(duration) }}
close
New speaker
Add speaker
close
Edit speaker
Save changes
close
Share Transcript