Conversaciones EE. UU.–Irán: incentivos y barreras (Full Transcript)

Análisis de las negociaciones en Ginebra: incentivos mutuos, presión israelí, costos políticos por la represión y complejidad técnica del acuerdo.
Download Transcript (DOCX)
Speakers
add Add new speaker

[00:00:00] Speaker 1: Iran and the United States are once again trying to thrash out a deal that could limit Iran's nuclear program and de-escalate tensions. Delegations from both countries are heading to Geneva for the next round of indirect talks scheduled for Tuesday. But America's top diplomat Marco Rubio has warned that the discussions are likely to be complicated. Israel's Prime Minister has demanded the removal of all enriched uranium from Iran as part of any deal on Tehran's nuclear program. He also wants to curb Iran's development of ballistic missiles, which have been used to strike Israel. Rob McHare was the UK's ambassador to Iran from 2018 to 2021 and he joins us now, Ambassador. Thank you very much for joining us here on BBC News Now. How strong are the incentives for the US and Iran this time around?

[00:00:48] Speaker 2: Thank you. Well, there's clearly very strong incentives in principle for both sides to do a deal. After all, you know, the underlying principle of putting Iran's nuclear program under serious constraints and removing it as a threat is a real attraction for the US and important for the world. And for Iran, getting some sanctions relief to support their really failing economy is also a strong incentive. But I think you have to look at the fact that against that, there's some really huge obstacles to reaching agreement. I mean, Iran, after all, has just killed many thousands and perhaps tens of thousands of its own people. That makes it very hard and controversial to reach an agreement that lifts sanctions on them. And that, together with pressure from Israel and pressure from regime change hawks inside his own administration, will put incentives on President Trump to make maximalist demands. And then from Iran's side, it's extremely unlikely that they would be able to make that sort of this or compromises that that would demand. And as you said just now, both sides of this, actually, the technicalities of the nuclear side and the technicalities of the sanctions lift side are really, really complex. So it's really difficult to see how they get there.

[00:02:04] Speaker 1: And in terms of optics, which we know matter internationally, particularly, how difficult is it for the United States to be offering a deal with a country where we've seen thousands of protesters killed in recent weeks?

[00:02:19] Speaker 2: I think it is very hard. But I think it's clear that President Trump himself does want to reach a deal. And I think that the way he's described the military buildup in the region shows very clearly that he wants to be able to say, I have achieved this deal with Iran and we have gone further than anyone else has done before to limit their nuclear program. But what that does, and obviously the way that President Trump sees it, flexibility, optionality, unpredictability, they're all things that he sees as really important skills that he has in negotiating. But it means the result is that one day he's calling for the regime to be overthrown and the next for an agreement with that regime, which will give it sanctions relief. And it's although that optionality might keep the other side off balance, it also risks just falling between those two stools and getting neither of them.

[00:03:15] Speaker 1: How divided is public opinion in Iran about what should happen in terms of the kind of regime that should be in charge or whether they're better off with what they already know?

[00:03:26] Speaker 2: It's incredibly hard to generalize about what the population of Iran, a country of 90 million people, plus what they actually think. I think there's obviously huge amounts of anger and amongst the vast majority of the population a complete disdain for the regime that has governed them for the last four decades. And they would dearly love to see the back of it. But that doesn't mean to say they want to see it replaced with chaos. I think people are probably very conflicted. I think people are also conflicted about the role that Reza Pahlavi might play, who's obviously become a big voice, a big figure in calling for regime change from outside. And so I think that there are a lot of very, very different currents of opinion inside the country. I also think the one thing you have to remember is that even though the regime is very unpopular and has really lost all legitimacy with most Iranian citizens, there's still a core of support for it. And even if that support is, say, around 10 percent, which is what some people reckon, that's still around 9 million people. So there's not a consensus of view in Iran about where it wants to go next.

[00:04:33] Speaker 1: Rob McHare, former UK ambassador to Iran, thank you very much for talking to us.

[00:04:38] Speaker 2: Thank you.

ai AI Insights
Arow Summary
En BBC News Now se analiza la nueva ronda de conversaciones indirectas en Ginebra entre Irán y Estados Unidos para limitar el programa nuclear iraní y reducir tensiones. El exembajador británico en Irán (2018–2021), Rob McHare, afirma que existen fuertes incentivos: para EE. UU., restringir de forma seria el programa nuclear; para Irán, lograr alivio de sanciones ante una economía en deterioro. Sin embargo, ve obstáculos enormes: la represión interna iraní y la muerte de miles de manifestantes dificultan políticamente levantar sanciones; la presión de Israel y de sectores partidarios del cambio de régimen en EE. UU. empuja a demandas maximalistas (como retirar todo el uranio enriquecido y limitar misiles balísticos), concesiones que Irán difícilmente aceptaría. Además, la complejidad técnica de las limitaciones nucleares y del levantamiento de sanciones complica el acuerdo. McHare añade que Trump parece querer un acuerdo y usa una estrategia de “opcionalidad” e imprevisibilidad, pero eso puede llevar a no conseguir ni acuerdo ni cambio de régimen. Sobre la opinión pública iraní, señala una mayoría con fuerte rechazo al régimen, aunque con temor al caos; existen corrientes diversas (incluido el rol de Reza Pahlavi) y un núcleo de apoyo al régimen que, aun siendo minoritario, suma millones de personas.
Arow Title
Incentivos y obstáculos en las nuevas conversaciones EE. UU.–Irán
Arow Keywords
Irán Remove
Estados Unidos Remove
conversaciones en Ginebra Remove
programa nuclear Remove
sanciones Remove
alivio de sanciones Remove
Israel Remove
uranio enriquecido Remove
misiles balísticos Remove
Marco Rubio Remove
Donald Trump Remove
cambio de régimen Remove
protestas Remove
represión Remove
Reza Pahlavi Remove
opinión pública iraní Remove
Arow Key Takeaways
  • Hay incentivos claros: limitar el programa nuclear para EE. UU. y lograr alivio de sanciones para Irán.
  • La represión interna en Irán hace políticamente costoso ofrecer levantamiento de sanciones.
  • Israel impulsa condiciones duras (retirar uranio enriquecido y frenar misiles), lo que empuja a demandas maximalistas.
  • Las complejidades técnicas del control nuclear y del levantamiento de sanciones dificultan un acuerdo rápido.
  • La estrategia de Trump de imprevisibilidad puede desestabilizar la negociación y terminar sin resultados.
  • En Irán predomina el rechazo al régimen, pero no hay consenso sobre la alternativa; existe un núcleo de apoyo aún significativo.
Arow Sentiments
Neutral: Tono analítico y prudente: reconoce incentivos para un acuerdo pero subraya riesgos políticos, presiones externas y dificultades técnicas, sin adoptar una postura emocional marcada.
Arow Enter your query
{{ secondsToHumanTime(time) }}
Back
Forward
{{ Math.round(speed * 100) / 100 }}x
{{ secondsToHumanTime(duration) }}
close
New speaker
Add speaker
close
Edit speaker
Save changes
close
Share Transcript