Iran-U.S. Oman talks begin with agenda gap (Full Transcript)

Tehran and Washington reopen talks in Oman, split over whether talks cover only nuclear issues or also missiles and regional proxy ties.
Download Transcript (DOCX)
Speakers
add Add new speaker

[00:00:00] Speaker 1: Iran's foreign minister says his nation is ready to defend itself against excessive demand or adventurism by the United States as talks between the two countries get underway in Oman. These are the first talks in eight months, with Washington exploring the possibility of a diplomatic solution to curb Tehran's nuclear program. The discussions in Oman are being led by the Iranian foreign minister, Abbas Arachi, and the U.S. Special Envoy Steve Whitkoff. It's taken days of difficult and delicate diplomacy to get them to happen at all. It comes after a U.S. military build-up in the Middle East in response to Iran's violent repression of nationwide anti-government protests last month, which human rights groups say killed thousands of people. Well, let's go live to Beirut and speak to our Middle East correspondent Hugo Bashega. And Hugo, before these talks even begin, the two sides are disagreeing over what they're negotiating about.

[00:01:05] Speaker 2: Exactly. And I think he really shows the huge gap between the positions of the Iranians and the Americans. The Americans were saying that, look, these talks need to focus not only on the issue over Iran's nuclear program, but also on Iran's ballistic missiles and Iran's support for proxies in the region, such as Hamas, militias in Iraq, the Houthis in Yemen, and obviously Hezbollah here in Lebanon. But the Iranians said that the talks would only focus on the nuclear program. So we still don't know whether these differences have been resolved. Iranian officials have been saying that they are willing to make concessions, that they are flexible when it comes to discussions about the country's nuclear program. But they say that they are not going to discuss any kind of limits to its ballistic missiles. They say that these demands by the Americans are unacceptable and a breach of the country's sovereignty. So I think the expectation today is very, very low. I think the hope here is that we could see if these negotiations, the talks today, are successful, a framework for possible negotiations that would obviously lead to de-escalation, to a de-escalation of the crisis here amid this massive U.S. military build-up in the region.

[00:02:28] Speaker 1: Hugo, I want to ask you about the view there in Beirut. Of course, Iran has interests in Lebanon. It supports Hezbollah there. How are people in the region feeling about these tensions?

[00:02:42] Speaker 2: Yeah, I think the talks today are being seen by many as a last opportunity to prevent a military attack by the U.S. on Iran. For the Iranians, obviously, the talks are crucial to keep this diplomatic possibility open to avert a military strike on the country. And I think for President Trump, this could offer an off-ramp from his military threats. He has obviously threatened to strike Iran if no deal is reached, if the country doesn't accept his demands. There has been this huge military build-up in the Middle East in response to the violent crackdown of those anti-government demonstrations that happened across Iran last month. And across the region, there has been a lot of concern that any kind of military attack on Iran could lead to chaos inside the country, but also to a wider regional conflict, because Iran has said that it would respond to any kind of American attack by targeting military assets in the region, American military assets in the region. So Gulf countries in particular are very concerned. The Iranians have said that Israel could also be targeted. And there is the concern that Iranian proxies in the region, including Hezbollah here in Lebanon, could also be involved in this Iranian, possible Iranian response to an American attack. So that's one of the reasons why there has been so much concern across this region.

[00:04:19] Speaker 1: Hugo, thank you. That's our Middle East correspondent, Hugo Bashega, in Beirut there.

ai AI Insights
Arow Summary
Iran and the United States have resumed talks in Oman after eight months, amid heightened regional tensions and a U.S. military build-up. The U.S. wants negotiations to cover Iran’s nuclear program plus ballistic missiles and support for regional proxies, while Iran insists talks focus only on the nuclear issue and rejects missile limits as a sovereignty violation. Expectations are low, but both sides may seek a framework to de-escalate and avert a potential U.S. strike. Regional actors, especially Gulf states and Lebanon, fear any attack could trigger broader conflict involving Iranian retaliation, Israel, and allied groups like Hezbollah.
Arow Title
Iran-U.S. talks in Oman open amid sharp agenda dispute
Arow Keywords
Iran Remove
United States Remove
Oman talks Remove
nuclear program Remove
ballistic missiles Remove
regional proxies Remove
Hamas Remove
Houthis Remove
Hezbollah Remove
U.S. military build-up Remove
de-escalation Remove
Middle East tensions Remove
Arow Key Takeaways
  • Talks resume in Oman after an eight-month pause, driven by a desire to avert further escalation.
  • Core dispute is the scope: U.S. seeks broader talks (nuclear, missiles, proxies); Iran wants nuclear-only.
  • Iran signals flexibility on nuclear concessions but rejects missile constraints as unacceptable.
  • A successful meeting may only produce a framework for further negotiations rather than a deal.
  • Regional states fear a U.S. strike could spark Iranian retaliation and a wider conflict involving proxies and Israel.
Arow Sentiments
Neutral: The tone is cautious and tense, emphasizing disagreement over the agenda, low expectations, and fears of escalation, while noting diplomacy as a possible off-ramp.
Arow Enter your query
{{ secondsToHumanTime(time) }}
Back
Forward
{{ Math.round(speed * 100) / 100 }}x
{{ secondsToHumanTime(duration) }}
close
New speaker
Add speaker
close
Edit speaker
Save changes
close
Share Transcript