Lawmakers Clash Over Survivors, Epstein, Antisemitism (Full Transcript)

A tense hearing exchange features demands for the Attorney General to meet survivors and a sharp dispute involving Epstein references and antisemitism claims.
Download Transcript (DOCX)
Speakers
add Add new speaker

[00:00:00] Speaker 1: Do you want to go there, Attorney General? Do you want to go there? Do the right thing, Attorney General. Meet with the survivors. They have been asking for a year. Meet with the survivors. Do the right thing. I yield back.

[00:00:13] Speaker 2: I was curious if you, Congresswoman, asked Bill Clinton that. Didn't see one tweet. Not one. I didn't see one tweet when Joe Biden was in office about Bill Clinton. Didn't ask Merrick Garland anything about Epstein. Not once when he was. Weak sauce. And also, I want the record to reflect that, you know, with this anti-Semitic culture right now, she voted against a resolution condemning. Oh, do you want to go there, Attorney General?

[00:00:46] Speaker 1: Do you want to go there? Are you serious talking about anti-Semitism to a woman who lost her grandfather in the Holocaust? Really? Really?

ai AI Insights
Arow Summary
In a heated exchange, Speaker 1 urges the Attorney General to meet with survivors who have requested a meeting for a year. Speaker 2 responds by accusing Speaker 1 of hypocrisy for not publicly pressing prior administrations about Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein, calls the criticism “weak,” and adds an allegation related to voting against a resolution condemning antisemitism. Speaker 1 rebukes Speaker 2 for invoking antisemitism, citing her family’s Holocaust loss.
Arow Title
Contentious exchange over survivors meeting and antisemitism
Arow Keywords
Attorney General Remove
survivors Remove
meeting request Remove
Jeffrey Epstein Remove
Bill Clinton Remove
Joe Biden Remove
Merrick Garland Remove
hypocrisy आरोप Remove
antisemitism Remove
Holocaust Remove
Congress hearing Remove
political confrontation Remove
Arow Key Takeaways
  • Speaker 1 presses for the Attorney General to meet with survivors who have sought access for a year.
  • Speaker 2 counters with whataboutism, referencing Bill Clinton, Epstein, and the Biden-era DOJ to allege inconsistency.
  • The exchange escalates when Speaker 2 raises antisemitism and a vote on a condemnation resolution.
  • Speaker 1 responds forcefully, invoking personal family history tied to the Holocaust.
Arow Sentiments
Negative: The tone is confrontational and accusatory, marked by sharp challenges, claims of hypocrisy, and an emotionally charged rebuttal regarding antisemitism and the Holocaust.
Arow Enter your query
{{ secondsToHumanTime(time) }}
Back
Forward
{{ Math.round(speed * 100) / 100 }}x
{{ secondsToHumanTime(duration) }}
close
New speaker
Add speaker
close
Edit speaker
Save changes
close
Share Transcript