Officials Shift on Guns at Protests After Pretty Death (Full Transcript)

Transcript contrasts past defenses of armed protesters with new warnings, as officials say gun rights don’t extend to impeding immigration enforcement.
Download Transcript (DOCX)
Speakers
add Add new speaker

[00:00:00] Speaker 1: And when you see those lunatics all over the streets, it's damn nice to have arms. You can't walk in with guns, you just can't. Listen, you can't walk in with guns, you can't do that.

[00:00:13] Speaker 2: President Trump's stance on guns at protests has changed over the years. We uncovered several instances of Trump administration officials who have changed their language on this issue in the wake of Alex Pretty's death. After the 2020 unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin, Trump declined to condemn Kyle Rittenhouse, who was armed with a rifle and later fatally shot two people during the protest there.

[00:00:32] Speaker 1: They very violently attacked him. He probably would have been killed. He should not have had to suffer through a trial for that.

[00:00:39] Speaker 2: He was going to be dead. Rittenhouse was acquitted of charges against him and said he brought a rifle as a precaution and had acted in self-defense. Trump also defended Mark and Patricia McCloskey after they pointed guns at racial justice protesters outside their home in St. Louis.

[00:00:54] Speaker 1: They were going to be beat up badly if they were lucky. And these people were standing there, never used it, and they were legal, the weapons.

[00:01:03] Speaker 2: Kristi Noem also once wrote approvingly about hundreds of armed bikers who showed up at a Black Lives Matter protest in South Dakota with, quote, their Second Amendment rights on full display. The message was clear, no riots or looting tonight. But Noem sounds very different talking about Pretty.

[00:01:21] Speaker 3: I don't know of any peaceful protester that shows up with a gun and ammunition rather than a sign.

[00:01:28] Speaker 2: Kash Patel also forcefully defended Kyle Rittenhouse, but had this to say about Pretty. You cannot bring a firearm loaded with multiple magazines to any sort of protest that you want. It's that simple. That even caught the attention of Mark McCloskey. He posted on X, quote, say goodbye to the Second Amendment. Once again, the government using crisis to take away your rights. When CNN reached out to the administration for comment, a DHS spokesperson accused Pretty of, quote, obstructing law enforcement and said that, quote, Americans have a right to show up to a protest with a gun, but you must follow the law. A White House official also told CNN this is an entirely different situation. Rittenhouse said no interaction with federal law enforcement or ongoing law enforcement operations. And White House Press Secretary Caroline Levin put out a statement saying, quote, while Americans have a constitutional right to bear arms, Americans do not have a constitutional right to impede lawful immigration enforcement operations.

ai AI Insights
Arow Summary
The transcript discusses how President Trump and several allies have shifted rhetoric on guns at protests. It contrasts past defenses of armed individuals at protests—such as Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha and the McCloskeys in St. Louis—and Kristi Noem’s prior praise for armed bikers at a BLM protest, with newer statements condemning bringing loaded firearms to protests following the death of Alex Pretty. Administration responses emphasize that gun rights exist but must comply with law and cannot be used to impede federal immigration enforcement operations, arguing the situations differ from prior cases.
Arow Title
Trump Allies’ Shifting Rhetoric on Guns at Protests
Arow Keywords
guns Remove
protests Remove
Donald Trump Remove
Kyle Rittenhouse Remove
McCloskey Remove
Kristi Noem Remove
Kash Patel Remove
Alex Pretty Remove
Second Amendment Remove
immigration enforcement Remove
DHS Remove
CNN Remove
Arow Key Takeaways
  • Trump previously declined to condemn and at times defended armed individuals at protests (Rittenhouse; McCloskeys).
  • Some officials who once spoke favorably about armed presence at protests now criticize bringing firearms and ammunition, citing the Alex Pretty case.
  • Kash Patel and others frame the new stance as disallowing loaded firearms at protests, prompting backlash from Second Amendment advocates.
  • The administration argues gun rights are subject to legal constraints and distinguishes protests from actions that impede lawful immigration enforcement.
  • Official statements emphasize a constitutional right to bear arms but not a right to obstruct law enforcement operations.
Arow Sentiments
Neutral: The tone is largely reportorial, presenting contrasts in public statements and official responses without overt emotional language, though it includes charged quotes about violence and rights.
Arow Enter your query
{{ secondsToHumanTime(time) }}
Back
Forward
{{ Math.round(speed * 100) / 100 }}x
{{ secondsToHumanTime(duration) }}
close
New speaker
Add speaker
close
Edit speaker
Save changes
close
Share Transcript