Ratcliffe apologises after ‘colonised’ immigration remark (Full Transcript)

Sir Jim Ratcliffe apologises for his wording but says debate on controlled, growth-linked immigration is vital amid strong UK political backlash.
Download Transcript (DOCX)
Speakers
add Add new speaker

[00:00:00] Speaker 1: We start the programme with some breaking news around the comments made by Sir Jim Radcliffe, the billionaire co-owner of Manchester United. We have just had news that he has apologised for comments that he made when he said the UK has been colonised by immigrants. Now in the past few minutes or so, he has said, I am sorry that my choice of language has offended some people in the UK and Europe. I am sorry that my choice of language has offended some people in the UK and Europe. And then went on to say, it is important to raise the issue of controlled and well-managed immigration that supports economic growth. So that comment just coming in the past few minutes or so from Sir Jim Radcliffe, apologising but saying it's important to raise the issue of controlled and well-managed immigration. So this comes after we had pressure from the Prime Minister of the UK, Sakhir Starmer, who said the comments he made were offensive and wrong and said that he should apologise. Sakhir saying that Britain was a proud, tolerant and diverse country. And that was when he also called on Sir Jim to apologise. Let's bring in our political correspondent, Nick Urdley, who is in Westminster for us. We have just had this apology through from Sir Jim. What other details do you have of any, Nick? When did he say it? Where was he?

[00:01:28] Speaker 2: What I can tell you is the political reaction to this has been pretty vociferous over the last 12 hours, actually. The Government has been very critical of Sir Jim Radcliffe's comments. We heard, as you said, the Prime Minister calling for an apology in the last half hour. The Chancellor has called the comments disgusting. There is a wider question here, I think, about immigration, which has been coming up at Westminster. It's interesting that Reform UK have taken a very different tack. Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, saying that mass migration has changed the character of a number of areas and Labour might try to ignore it, but Reform won't. What does seem to have frustrated a lot of people at Westminster, though, is the language used by Sir Jim Radcliffe in his statement. It seems this apology, which I'm going to be honest, I don't have the full thing in front of me, but from the lines that have been sent from it, he's saying that he's sorry for his choice of language offending some people.

[00:02:28] Speaker 1: Nick, I'm just going to interrupt you because we have just received the statement. I'm going to read the statement so that we have it in full and then I'll get you to respond with some of the reaction that we've been having over the past 24 hours. Sir Jim says, I am sorry that my choice of language has offended some people in the UK and Europe and caused concern, but it is important to raise the issue of controlled and well-managed immigration that supports economic growth. My comments were made while answering questions about UK policy at the European Industry Summit in Antwerp, where I was discussing the importance of economic growth, jobs, skills and manufacturing in the UK. My intention was to stress that governments must manage migration alongside investment in skills, industry and jobs so that long-term prosperity is shared by everyone. It is critical that we maintain an open debate on the challenges facing the UK. So that is the statement that has just been sent through, Nick.

[00:03:23] Speaker 2: Yeah, and I think the question that I suspect a lot of politicians will be asked over the next few hours is, do they see that as a fulsome apology, or do they think the particular language of saying, I'm sorry that my choice of language offended people, goes far enough? I mean, the broader context for this, of course, is it's been a really bruising week for the government and I suspect the Prime Minister was more than happy to be in a place where he could talk about something other than his own leadership. Sometimes it's like Downing Street is as precarious as the Manchester United dugout at the moment. What the government has tried to do is say that these comments are completely wrong and that immigration has been good for the UK, but the context is really important. There's no doubt that there is a debate about mass migration going on in the UK Parliament. There's no doubt that this government under Keir Starmer has wanted to look tougher on that issue. And even though Sir Jim Ratcliffe's comments and his particular language have caused a lot of controversy and led to a lot of criticism, including that call for an apology, there are also some, particularly on the political right, who think he has a point and think that that conversation is one that is going to be absolutely crucial to British politics over the next few years.

[00:04:40] Speaker 1: Nick, great to have you with us, responding so quickly as well to this breaking news that Sir Jim Ratcliffe has apologised for his choice of language.

ai AI Insights
Arow Summary
Sir Jim Ratcliffe has issued an apology for remarks in which he said the UK had been “colonised by immigrants,” stating he is sorry his choice of language offended people in the UK and Europe. In his statement, delivered after political pressure including from Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Ratcliffe argues it remains important to discuss “controlled and well-managed immigration” that supports economic growth. The comments were made at the European Industry Summit in Antwerp during a discussion about UK economic policy, growth, jobs, skills and manufacturing. Westminster reaction has been strong, with senior government figures condemning the language, while Reform UK and others on the right argue concerns about mass migration and community change should not be ignored. The debate now turns to whether Ratcliffe’s wording constitutes a full apology and how it fits into the wider UK political argument over immigration and government toughness on the issue.
Arow Title
Ratcliffe apologises for ‘colonised’ remark amid UK backlash
Arow Keywords
Sir Jim Ratcliffe Remove
Manchester United Remove
immigration Remove
apology Remove
Keir Starmer Remove
UK government Remove
Westminster Remove
Reform UK Remove
Nigel Farage Remove
mass migration Remove
European Industry Summit Remove
Antwerp Remove
economic growth Remove
controlled immigration Remove
political reaction Remove
Arow Key Takeaways
  • Ratcliffe apologised for language that described the UK as “colonised by immigrants,” saying it offended people in the UK and Europe.
  • He maintained the need for a debate on “controlled and well-managed immigration” tied to economic growth.
  • The remarks were made at the European Industry Summit in Antwerp during discussion of UK growth, jobs, skills and manufacturing.
  • The Prime Minister and senior ministers strongly criticised the original wording and called for an apology.
  • Reform UK and some on the right argue mass migration has altered communities and say the issue must be confronted.
  • Attention now shifts to whether the apology is considered sufficiently direct or merely regret for offense caused.
Arow Sentiments
Neutral: The segment is primarily factual and reportorial, but set against a tense political backdrop: condemnation from government figures (“offensive,” “wrong,” “disgusting”) and a contested debate on immigration. Ratcliffe’s apology language and the question of its sufficiency add mild controversy without an overtly emotional framing by the presenters.
Arow Enter your query
{{ secondsToHumanTime(time) }}
Back
Forward
{{ Math.round(speed * 100) / 100 }}x
{{ secondsToHumanTime(duration) }}
close
New speaker
Add speaker
close
Edit speaker
Save changes
close
Share Transcript