Rethinking Recovery: Abstinence vs Harm Reduction (Full Transcript)

A personal view on how recovery can be individualized, with 12-step foundations and support for harm reduction as a valid path.
Download Transcript (DOCX)
Speakers
add Add new speaker

[00:00:00] Speaker 1: It doesn't have to be complete abstinence, and I know that's controversial. I did start in 12 Steps. 12 Steps are the foundation of my recovery, but I believe that recovery can look different for everyone. And what works for me may not work for someone else. So I definitely think harm reduction or reducing the amount of drinks is just as beneficial as complete abstinence.

ai AI Insights
Arow Summary
The speaker shares that while 12-step programs were foundational to their recovery, they don’t believe recovery must mean complete abstinence for everyone. They argue recovery can look different person to person and that harm reduction—such as reducing the number of drinks—can be as beneficial as abstinence.
Arow Title
Recovery Can Include Harm Reduction, Not Only Abstinence
Arow Keywords
recovery Remove
12 steps Remove
abstinence Remove
harm reduction Remove
alcohol use Remove
personalized recovery Remove
reducing drinking Remove
sobriety Remove
controversy Remove
what works for me Remove
Arow Key Takeaways
  • 12-step programs can be a strong foundation, but they may not be the only valid path.
  • Recovery is individualized; what helps one person may not help another.
  • Harm reduction (drinking less) can be a meaningful form of recovery alongside abstinence.
  • It’s possible to value abstinence while still supporting alternatives for others.
Arow Sentiments
Neutral: The tone is thoughtful and reflective, acknowledging controversy while emphasizing flexibility and individual differences in recovery approaches.
Arow Enter your query
{{ secondsToHumanTime(time) }}
Back
Forward
{{ Math.round(speed * 100) / 100 }}x
{{ secondsToHumanTime(duration) }}
close
New speaker
Add speaker
close
Edit speaker
Save changes
close
Share Transcript