Why Some Top Artists Still Have Zero Grammys (Full Transcript)

Grammy wins depend on submissions, eligibility and voting reforms—here’s how the Recording Academy’s process can leave even legends without awards.
Download Transcript (DOCX)
Speakers
add Add new speaker

[00:00:00] Speaker 1: Is this the reason your favourite artist hasn't bagged a Grammy? Some of music's biggest names, Nicki Minaj, Lana Del Rey, Snoop Dogg, have never won. Even these legends have never scooped a competitive Grammy. What's going on? So before we blame the Grammys for throwing out snubs, there's a few things to know. Artists or their recording labels have to actually submit the music and make sure it meets certain eligibility requirements. If they don't submit, it simply won't be considered for a nomination. Frank Ocean's Blonde is a classic example. It was regarded as one of the best albums of 2016, but he chose not to submit, partly as a protest against the Academy's voting system. Who are the voters? Well, it used to be small secret committees of about 15 to 30 insiders. But in 2021, those were scrapped after allegations of favouritism, rigging, and racism. This year, about 15,000 people are eligible to vote, including musicians, producers, lyricists, and even those who write album line and notes. The Academy said this shift made the process more transparent and put power back into the hands of its entire voting membership body. It's also previously called claims of rigging categorically false, has brought in new reforms, and publicly acknowledged its need to improve and evolve.

ai AI Insights
Arow Summary
The text explains why major artists may never win a competitive Grammy and why some acclaimed records aren’t nominated. Grammy consideration requires labels or artists to submit eligible work; if they don’t, it cannot be nominated, as with Frank Ocean’s 2016 album Blonde, which he withheld partly in protest of the Academy’s voting system. It also outlines changes to Grammy voting: previously, small secret committees of industry insiders influenced selections, but these were removed in 2021 after allegations of favoritism, rigging, and racism. The current process involves a much larger voting body—about 15,000 eligible members including musicians, producers, lyricists, and album-notes writers—intended to increase transparency and distribute power more broadly. The Academy has denied rigging, introduced reforms, and acknowledged the need to improve.
Arow Title
Why Some Big Artists Never Win Grammys
Arow Keywords
Grammy Awards Remove
music industry Remove
nominations Remove
submissions Remove
eligibility requirements Remove
Frank Ocean Remove
Blonde Remove
Recording Academy Remove
voting system Remove
secret committees Remove
transparency Remove
reforms Remove
bias allegations Remove
Arow Key Takeaways
  • Artists/labels must submit recordings to be eligible; unsubmitted work cannot be nominated.
  • Even widely praised albums can miss out if the artist opts out (e.g., Frank Ocean’s Blonde).
  • The Grammys previously used small, secret committees that drew criticism for bias and lack of transparency.
  • In 2021, those committees were scrapped amid allegations of favoritism, rigging, and racism.
  • Today’s voting body is much larger (~15,000 members), aiming to broaden representation and transparency.
  • The Recording Academy denies rigging and says it has implemented reforms and is working to improve.
Arow Sentiments
Neutral: Informative and explanatory tone, mentioning controversies (favoritism, rigging, racism) but focusing on process details and reforms rather than emotional language.
Arow Enter your query
{{ secondsToHumanTime(time) }}
Back
Forward
{{ Math.round(speed * 100) / 100 }}x
{{ secondsToHumanTime(duration) }}
close
New speaker
Add speaker
close
Edit speaker
Save changes
close
Share Transcript