Write a Literature Review Faster With a 3-Step Plan (Full Transcript)

Define your destination, read strategically, and synthesize evidence into a clear argument that justifies your research gap—without drowning in papers.
Download Transcript (DOCX)
Speakers
add Add new speaker

[00:00:00] Speaker 1: Writing a literature review doesn't have to be as hard as people make it out to be. Most students struggle because they start writing before they're actually clear on what the review is supposed to be and achieve. So here's a simple 3-step, 3-minute guide to getting your review done fast and in the right way. Step 1. Know where you're going first. Look, if you're going to take a road trip, you would have a map and a destination. It's the same with a literature review. A lot of researchers think a literature review is just supposed to be a summary of everything that's been written on their topic. It's not. A literature review is a structured argument for why your study, or in some cases, your dissertation, needs to exist. Your job is to take your reader to the edge of existing knowledge and make a case for the value of what you're going to do. So what does that mean? And then narrow and narrow again until you come to a gap that is going to glide right into what comes next. It's going to roll out the red carpet for your research. So before you start reading heavily, get clarity on where does your review need to end and what kind of gap are you trying to justify. If you don't know where you're going, the topic commonly stays too broad and the review never seems to end. That's when researchers feel like they're drowning in papers and go in circles. Step 2. Read with a purpose. Once you know where you're going and you understand the literature review funnel structure, reading gets much easier. So instead of reading everything, do this. Go to Google Scholar, find the 10 closest papers on your topic, and for each paper, start stripping out content. Specifically, what did the authors do and what they found. Our did plus found formula and the full citation so you don't run into a risk of plagiarism later on. Don't write paragraphs yet. Just start assembling the building blocks. When you start to see the same ideas and results and themes emerging from these papers, you're starting to hit a point of saturation. At this point, an outline usually starts to emerge naturally and you're getting a diminishing return from reading. You can actually stop reading here. Creating an outline at this stage is a must. You can't just wing a literature review like you may have done for other papers. Get the outline and structure in place here. Then you're ready for Step 3. Here we're going to write to synthesize, not just list. Think about the most boring literature review. It would read like author X said this, author Y said that. Instead, you want to synthesize by making a point that emerges from the literature. It's important that each of your paragraphs make one big point. No more, no less. Each paragraph, one point. And you use the studies and evidence in your literature review as examples to back up that point. So group studies together, compare them, explain what they collectively show. Each of your paragraphs should move your reader closer to the gap that you identified in the first step. So that by the end of your literature review, your readers will think this study that you're proposing to do feels inevitable, feels like it had to be done. So to recap, know where you're going, read with a purpose, synthesize, don't list. If you found this helpful, I've linked below a full step-by-step guide that goes into much more detail than we can do here in three minutes. Defining your initial topic all the way through writing up using our peer writing system. No AI needed. See you in the next video.

ai AI Insights
Arow Summary
The speaker argues that literature reviews are difficult mainly because writers begin without a clear purpose. A good literature review is not a comprehensive summary but a structured argument that justifies why a study or dissertation needs to exist by guiding the reader to the edge of current knowledge and identifying a specific gap. The speaker outlines a three-step process: (1) define the destination by clarifying where the review must end and what gap it will justify, narrowing the topic to avoid endless reading; (2) read with purpose by locating the 10 most relevant papers, extracting only what the authors did and found (plus full citations), and stopping when themes repeat and saturation is reached, then creating an outline; (3) write to synthesize rather than list by making one main point per paragraph and using grouped studies as evidence to compare, contrast, and build toward the identified gap so the proposed study feels inevitable.
Arow Title
A 3-Step Method to Write a Focused Literature Review
Arow Keywords
literature review Remove
research gap Remove
synthesis writing Remove
Google Scholar Remove
reading strategy Remove
outline Remove
saturation Remove
academic writing Remove
dissertation Remove
structured argument Remove
Arow Key Takeaways
  • A literature review should argue for the necessity of your study, not summarize everything on the topic.
  • Start by defining where the review will end and the specific gap you need to justify.
  • Narrow the topic iteratively to avoid endless searching and reading.
  • Read strategically: begin with the ~10 closest papers and extract only methods (did) and results (found) plus citations.
  • Stop reading when you reach thematic saturation and returns diminish.
  • Create an outline before drafting; don’t ‘wing’ a literature review.
  • Synthesize: write one main point per paragraph and use multiple studies as evidence to support that point.
  • Organize paragraphs to progressively lead the reader toward the identified gap so your study feels inevitable.
Arow Sentiments
Positive: The tone is encouraging and practical, aiming to reduce anxiety about literature reviews and offering a clear, confidence-building process with actionable steps.
Arow Enter your query
{{ secondsToHumanTime(time) }}
Back
Forward
{{ Math.round(speed * 100) / 100 }}x
{{ secondsToHumanTime(duration) }}
close
New speaker
Add speaker
close
Edit speaker
Save changes
close
Share Transcript