Court Website Fees Put Public Law Behind a Paywall (Full Transcript)
[00:00:00] Speaker 1: They don't charge you to walk into a court, they shouldn't charge you to use a court's website.
[00:00:04] Speaker 2: The law itself, the words, the substance, is supposed to be free and accessible. You would think that the government organization managing that would make it free and accessible.
[00:00:13] Speaker 1: That's the heart of it, in my mind at least. We're looking at the Chancery Court right now. I think my brain can't remember how expensive it is, because I think it's $50 a document or something, because it's just outrageous. I get that there are infrastructural things that need to be paid for, but at the same time, the law should be free.
- The speakers believe legal texts and court materials should be free for the public to access.
- They compare paid court websites unfavorably with the free physical entry to courthouses.
- They recognize that website infrastructure costs money but argue that high document fees are unjustified.
- A cited Chancery Court fee, estimated at about $50 per document, is characterized as outrageous.