Havana Syndrome Claims Renew Fears of Directed-Energy Attacks (Full Transcript)

A victim and interviewer discuss alleged attacks, government downplaying, and concerns that pulsed-audio or directed-energy tech could proliferate widely.
Download Transcript (DOCX)
Speakers
add Add new speaker

[00:00:00] Speaker 1: I remember texting my brother in real time thinking that I may not make it out of this. You know, there's extreme head pressure, crushing ear pain, and it just ratcheted up over the course of 15, 20-plus minutes, and it led to the point where I started blacking out from it.

[00:00:15] Speaker 2: Victims, as you know, of course, and you were one of the first to go public, have said for years these attacks were very real. Do you believe that the U.S. government wrongly downplayed the possibility of a coordinated attack? Oh, 100 percent.

[00:00:29] Speaker 1: I mean, there has been significant evidence over the years that has made its way under the cutting room floor, especially the CIA, under the last administration. So we've known there's been evidence, there's been all sorts of information pointing to this being real, who the actors are, what was used, et cetera, et cetera. So it feels like it's hopefully about time that the truth comes out, and we're hoping this administration can bring some clarity and some transparency to that.

[00:00:57] Speaker 2: One source told me that a genuine concern inside the U.S. government is that if this device proves to be responsible for this, that this technology, these pulsed audio waves, is a technology that multiple actors, state and non-state, could conceivably get their hands on. Is that something that concerns you, that this could proliferate?

[00:01:21] Speaker 1: I think it already has proliferated. I mean, we know the Chinese have a directed energy weapons program, an anti-personnel weapons program. We know the Russians have been working on this since the 1950s. So we are many, many decades and many billions of dollars behind on the research from the human aspect of this. So Havana proved we were kind of a best test case scenario in which you can clear out an embassy out of your country. I can't think of a better sales pitch to your adversaries than that.

ai AI Insights
Arow Summary
A speaker describes experiencing severe symptoms consistent with reported “Havana Syndrome” incidents—intense head pressure, crushing ear pain, escalating over minutes to near blackout. In an interview, the speakers argue victims’ claims were real and assert the U.S. government, particularly the CIA under the prior administration, downplayed or sidelined evidence suggesting a coordinated attack and identifiable actors and methods. They discuss concerns that a device using pulsed audio/directed-energy technology could be responsible and warn that such technology may already be proliferated among state and non-state actors, citing longstanding Russian research and Chinese directed-energy/anti-personnel programs. The speaker frames the Havana incidents as demonstrating an effective tactic for disrupting U.S. operations, urging greater transparency and clarity from the current administration.
Arow Title
Interview Discusses Havana Syndrome, Alleged Attacks, and Proliferation Concerns
Arow Keywords
Havana Syndrome Remove
directed energy Remove
pulsed audio waves Remove
U.S. government response Remove
CIA Remove
coordinated attack Remove
victims Remove
transparency Remove
Russia Remove
China Remove
anti-personnel weapons Remove
embassy security Remove
technology proliferation Remove
Arow Key Takeaways
  • A victim recounts acute, escalating symptoms that felt life-threatening.
  • Interviewees claim evidence of coordinated attacks was downplayed or sidelined within the U.S. government.
  • They suggest directed-energy or pulsed-audio technology as a possible mechanism.
  • Concerns center on proliferation: multiple state and potentially non-state actors could access similar capabilities.
  • Russia and China are cited as having longstanding or active programs, implying the U.S. lags in research and preparedness.
  • Calls are made for greater transparency and clarity from the current administration.
Arow Sentiments
Negative: The tone is urgent and alarming, emphasizing severe physical harm, perceived government downplaying, and fears of adversaries proliferating disruptive weapon-like technology.
Arow Enter your query
{{ secondsToHumanTime(time) }}
Back
Forward
{{ Math.round(speed * 100) / 100 }}x
{{ secondsToHumanTime(duration) }}
close
New speaker
Add speaker
close
Edit speaker
Save changes
close
Share Transcript