Hearing Presses Officials on “Domestic Terrorism” Claim (Full Transcript)

Officials say they didn’t advise Secretary Nome’s label and won’t speculate on why it was stated publicly during the incident.
Download Transcript (DOCX)
Speakers
add Add new speaker

[00:00:00] Speaker 1: When Secretary Nome said he was committing, quote, an act of domestic terrorism, are you the ones that told her that? No, sir. No, sir. Did anyone who reports to either of you provide this assessment to Secretary Nome that this was mass casualty, or he was attempting to inflict mass casualties and domestic terrorism? Did someone in your staff tell her that?

[00:00:21] Speaker 2: Not to my knowledge, sir.

[00:00:23] Speaker 1: So why would Secretary Nome, why would she tell the public that this was an act of domestic terrorism right in the heat of the moment? How would she possibly come to that kind of conclusion to tell the American public that when they're watching this video?

[00:00:38] Speaker 3: I can't speculate on what someone else would say or why, sir.

[00:00:42] Speaker 1: Mr. Lyons? Sir, I can't speculate to what the Secretary thought at that time, sir.

ai AI Insights
Arow Summary
A lawmaker questions whether staff advised Secretary Nome to label an incident as “domestic terrorism” and “mass casualty” in real time. Two officials deny knowledge of providing that assessment and decline to speculate on the Secretary’s reasoning for making the public statement during the event.
Arow Title
Officials deny advising “domestic terrorism” label
Arow Keywords
Secretary Nome Remove
domestic terrorism Remove
mass casualty Remove
public statement Remove
staff assessment Remove
hearing Remove
speculation Remove
incident Remove
Arow Key Takeaways
  • A lawmaker seeks to identify who characterized the incident as domestic terrorism and mass-casualty intent.
  • Officials state they did not, to their knowledge, provide that assessment to the Secretary.
  • Witnesses repeatedly refuse to speculate about the Secretary’s thinking or motives in making the statement.
  • The exchange highlights tension over messaging accuracy during rapidly unfolding events.
Arow Sentiments
Neutral: The exchange is inquisitive and defensive, focused on attributing the source of an assessment; officials respond cautiously and avoid speculation.
Arow Enter your query
{{ secondsToHumanTime(time) }}
Back
Forward
{{ Math.round(speed * 100) / 100 }}x
{{ secondsToHumanTime(duration) }}
close
New speaker
Add speaker
close
Edit speaker
Save changes
close
Share Transcript