How AI Is Cutting Trial Prep Time Without Cutting Quality (Full Transcript)

A trial lawyer explains how tools like FileVine AI find citations, draft exam outlines, and search transcripts in seconds—making litigation work more sustainable.
Download Transcript (DOCX)
Speakers
add Add new speaker

[00:00:00] Speaker 1: How do you think about applying technology to those cases, and where, and where does it make sense, and where does it not? I take the path of least resistance whenever possible, right? I mean, throwing extra bodies at the case to quote-unquote build time is of no value to me. Right. It really is all about finding ways to, you know, to kind of work smarter and to be more efficient. One of the things that this was really one of the first trials as various, I think, AI tools have finally matured to the point where they can really effectively help to get you 50% of the way there, to help with that doc review, to help with that review of that 97-page order, help build out, as we had to there, two different trials.

[00:00:39] Speaker 2: Was FileVine helpful to you?

[00:00:41] Speaker 1: There were a couple of moments during the case where I was literally working on, for instance, you know, one of my experts directs, and, or, or certain evidence that I knew I would think I would want to get in. And I was like, wait, I know somewhere in this 96-page order the court mentioned this thing, mentioned that this evidence applied to this. And so I just ask FileVine's robot, where in the court's order did it say this? And give me the citation. And it was like, boop, boom. Amazing. Here it is. And helping me, for instance, one of the benefits of these being federal court cases is everybody has to do these very extensive federal court reports, these Rule 26 reports. And so I would then have the AI. These are like the big evidentiary disclosures. Exactly. Gotcha. That the experts would write. And I would say, here's their four reports. In this case, because they withheld evidence, and there was a whole bunch of other issues, and I would throw it in, and I would say, draft me a direct examination with citations. And it gave me something that got me 50% to 60% of the way there. And I will tell you what that translates to in real time is rather than spending 8 to 12 hours to prepare that expert's direct, I spend two. That's fantastic. But where it has really been exceedingly helpful just as of yesterday, I'm talking to my appellate lawyer who's preparing the post-trial motion. And he's like, hey, can you ask your AI where in the trial transcript the judge talked about this issue? And we all knew there was two or three times that we had this discussion. I dumped the whole 16 days of trial transcripts in and say, tell me when this issue was discussed. And just on trial day eight and the afternoon on page 14, there was a robust discussion about this. On trial day 14, there was a discussion about this. Here, there was only three lines mentioned it, but blah, blah, blah. And it gives me the sites, and then I click through, and I send it over. I am so glad. And that's huge, man. Yeah, it is. Seriously, to put that in real terms as well, that's the kind of thing that I used to have to have, most likely a law clerk, not even a paralegal. I needed someone with some legal acumen. I literally could look at four to eight hours of a human's time was handled in under 30 seconds with FileVan AI.

[00:03:14] Speaker 2: That's so great.

[00:03:15] Speaker 1: That's for real.

[00:03:16] Speaker 2: That's real value. I just think trial is such an engrossing and intense thing that requires just tremendous context. But is there, as a society, I think we get so much out of that confrontation that the law brings. It sort of bends the arc of justice. Do you think that's happening with the younger generation? Are you helping that? I mean, do you feel like it's your responsibility to bring those lawyers up and get them in the courtroom? A hundred percent.

[00:03:38] Speaker 1: I don't think we are going to see a shortage of trial lawyers in the future. I think, in fact, what we can show is that this can be incredibly rewarding and incredibly important work of deep and ultimate concern. But you can also do it without having three divorces, a substance abuse problem, and a mental health breakdown. And I think that that's where the good of so many of these AI tools can really help to balance out. You can do it, and yet you can do it without sacrificing everything else. And if that is what we are able to show the next generation through the adoption, the early adoption of these tools and the integration of it into what we do, then I think they're going to be lined up around the block.

ai AI Insights
Arow Summary
The speakers discuss how mature AI tools can meaningfully improve efficiency in litigation without simply adding staff. They describe using FileVine’s AI to quickly locate specific language and citations in a lengthy court order, generate draft direct examinations from expert Rule 26 reports with citations, and search 16 days of trial transcripts to find where particular issues were discussed—tasks that previously took hours of skilled human time. Beyond productivity, they argue AI can make trial practice more sustainable, helping train and retain younger lawyers by reducing burnout and preserving work-life balance while keeping the core value of courtroom advocacy intact.
Arow Title
How AI Tools Like FileVine Boost Trial Prep Efficiency
Arow Keywords
legal AI Remove
FileVine Remove
trial preparation Remove
document review Remove
court orders Remove
citations Remove
Rule 26 reports Remove
expert disclosures Remove
direct examination Remove
trial transcripts Remove
post-trial motions Remove
appellate practice Remove
law firm efficiency Remove
law clerk time Remove
burnout prevention Remove
work-life balance Remove
next-generation trial lawyers Remove
Arow Key Takeaways
  • AI can handle high-volume legal text search (orders, transcripts) in seconds, returning pinpoint citations.
  • Drafting support (e.g., expert direct exams with citations) can cut prep time from a full day to a couple hours, with attorneys still refining the work.
  • Using AI reduces reliance on additional staff for tasks requiring legal acumen, freeing humans for strategy and advocacy.
  • Adopting AI may help reduce burnout in trial practice, improving retention and making the profession more attractive to younger lawyers.
  • Technology is framed as augmenting—rather than replacing—the core value of courtroom confrontation and context-rich advocacy.
Arow Sentiments
Positive: The tone is enthusiastic and pragmatic, emphasizing concrete time savings, improved accuracy in finding citations, and the broader benefit of making demanding trial work more sustainable for lawyers.
Arow Enter your query
{{ secondsToHumanTime(time) }}
Back
Forward
{{ Math.round(speed * 100) / 100 }}x
{{ secondsToHumanTime(duration) }}
close
New speaker
Add speaker
close
Edit speaker
Save changes
close
Share Transcript