Lawmakers Clash With Attorney General Over Epstein Case (Full Transcript)

A contentious hearing exchange centers on demands for indictments and investigations into Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged co-conspirators amid accusations of filibustering.
Download Transcript (DOCX)
Speakers
add Add new speaker

[00:00:00] Speaker 1: How many of Epstein's co-conspirators have you indicted? How many perpetrators are you even investigating?

[00:00:07] Speaker 2: First, you showed it. I find it— How many have you indicted? Excuse me. I'm going to answer the question.

[00:00:14] Speaker 3: I answer my question.

[00:00:15] Speaker 2: No, I'm going to answer the question the way I want to answer the question.

[00:00:18] Speaker 3: No, you're going to answer the question the way I asked it.

[00:00:20] Speaker 4: You can let her filibuster all day long, but not on our watch. Not on our time. No way. And I told you about that, Attorney General, before you started.

[00:00:28] Speaker 2: You don't tell me anything.

[00:00:29] Speaker 4: Oh, I did tell you, because we saw what you did in the Senate.

[00:00:32] Speaker 2: He's our lawyer. Not even a lawyer.

ai AI Insights
Arow Summary
A tense exchange unfolds as a questioner presses an Attorney General about indictments and investigations related to Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged co-conspirators. The Attorney General insists on answering in her own way, while another participant objects, accusing her of filibustering and referencing prior conduct in the Senate. The interaction escalates into interruptions and personal jabs, reflecting conflict over accountability and control of the discussion.
Arow Title
Heated confrontation over Epstein co-conspirators
Arow Keywords
Jeffrey Epstein Remove
co-conspirators Remove
indictments Remove
investigations Remove
Attorney General Remove
accountability Remove
filibuster Remove
Senate hearing Remove
interruptions Remove
congressional oversight Remove
Arow Key Takeaways
  • The central demand is for specifics on indictments and ongoing investigations tied to Epstein’s network.
  • The Attorney General resists the framing of the question and asserts control over how she will respond.
  • Participants challenge the Attorney General’s approach, alleging time-wasting and referencing past hearing behavior.
  • The exchange deteriorates into personal attacks, indicating a breakdown in productive dialogue.
Arow Sentiments
Negative: The tone is confrontational and hostile, marked by repeated interruptions, accusations of filibustering, and dismissive remarks that signal frustration and distrust.
Arow Enter your query
{{ secondsToHumanTime(time) }}
Back
Forward
{{ Math.round(speed * 100) / 100 }}x
{{ secondsToHumanTime(duration) }}
close
New speaker
Add speaker
close
Edit speaker
Save changes
close
Share Transcript