Lawmakers Slam DOJ Redactions in Epstein File Release (Full Transcript)

Critics say victim statements are heavily blacked out, exposing survivors while shielding potential abusers and undermining the intent of the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Download Transcript (DOCX)

Speakers

Add new speaker

[00:00:00] Speaker 1: Absolutely unbelievable that we have a Department of Justice that this is saying this is the best job they could do, and that including revealing private information about survivors. I happened to see a victim statement in the files that was seven pages long. And of those seven pages, four of them are completely black. And so this survivor came forward, told their story, and anything that's in there that was relevant to important data that we should have now, that we should all know, because of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, is completely redacted.

[00:00:39] Speaker 2: So are you saying that the survivors are being identified and the potential abusers are being protected? Is that your point?

[00:00:49] Speaker 1: That is exactly my point.

Summary

A speaker criticizes the Department of Justice for heavily redacting victim statements in the Epstein-related files, arguing that survivors’ private information is being exposed while key details that could implicate abusers are withheld, undermining the intent of the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Copy

Download

Title

Criticism of DOJ Redactions in Epstein Files

Copy

Download

Keywords

Department of Justice Remove

Remove

Epstein files Remove

Remove

redactions Remove

Remove

victim statement Remove

Remove

survivors

Remove

privacy

Remove

transparency Remove

Remove

Epstein Files Transparency Act Remove

Remove

abusers

Remove

accountability Remove

Remove

Copy

Download

Key Takeaways

The speaker alleges DOJ redactions remove critical information from survivor accounts.
A cited victim statement was mostly blacked out, limiting public access to relevant details.
The speaker argues survivors’ privacy may be compromised while potential abusers are protected.
The redactions are framed as contradicting the purpose of the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Copy

Download

Sentiments

Negative: The tone is outraged and accusatory, emphasizing disbelief, frustration, and concern that survivors are harmed while alleged abusers are shielded by extensive redactions.

Copy

Download

Enter your query

{{ secondsToHumanTime(time) }}

Back

Forward

{{ Math.round(speed * 100) / 100 }}x

{{ secondsToHumanTime(duration) }}

Select Audio file