Minister Backs Appeal Over Palestine Action Ban Ruling (Full Transcript)

After a High Court ruling criticising the proscription of Palestine Action, ministers say the Home Secretary will appeal, citing security and public safety advice.
Download Transcript (DOCX)
Speakers
add Add new speaker

[00:00:00] Speaker 1: The High Court said that your decision to prescribe Palestine action, essentially say they're a terrorist group, the court found that that was wrong, that you'd made a mistake in how you went about that. One of those who's been arrested, 83-year-old Church of England priest Sue Parfit, she's been charged under the Terrorism Act for holding a placard up supporting Palestine action. We spoke to her yesterday and she has a message for you.

[00:00:26] Speaker 2: I do not consider myself a terrorist. It is quite ludicrous to consider that I am. I'm an Anglican priest and I have worked for peace and justice all my life. This is not what terrorism is. We know what terrorism is. It is people like al-Qaeda and people who have done terrible acts against communities.

[00:00:53] Speaker 3: You got this wrong, didn't you?

[00:00:56] Speaker 4: The Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, has looked at this and been very clear she disagrees with the judgment and is appealing against it. I'm not going to cut across that, but let me just say this, that the advice that I had and I suspect the advice that Shabana will have had as well was very clearly about the risks around violence, around violent threats and around public safety as well. I think when you're faced with that advice as a Home Secretary, you have to take it immensely seriously.

ai AI Insights
Arow Summary
An interviewer challenges the UK Home Secretary over the High Court ruling that the decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist group was flawed. The case highlights the arrest and charging under the Terrorism Act of 83-year-old Anglican priest Sue Parfit for holding a placard supporting Palestine Action. A government representative responds that the Home Secretary disagrees with the judgment and is appealing, emphasizing that security advice focused on risks of violence, threats, and public safety must be taken seriously.
Arow Title
Home Secretary Defends Appeal on Palestine Action Proscription
Arow Keywords
High Court Remove
Home Secretary Remove
proscription Remove
Palestine Action Remove
Terrorism Act Remove
Sue Parfit Remove
Church of England Remove
appeal Remove
public safety Remove
violent threats Remove
Arow Key Takeaways
  • The High Court found fault with the process/decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist group.
  • An 83-year-old Anglican priest, Sue Parfit, was charged under the Terrorism Act for holding a supportive placard.
  • The Home Secretary rejects the judgment and is pursuing an appeal.
  • Government justification relies on security advice about potential violence, threats, and public safety risks.
  • The case raises questions about proportionality and the scope of terrorism legislation in relation to protest activity.
Arow Sentiments
Neutral: The exchange is predominantly adversarial and factual, centering on a legal ruling and government response. Emotional cues appear in the priest’s disbelief at being labeled a terrorist and the interviewer’s accusatory question, balanced by the official’s procedural and security-focused justification.
Arow Enter your query
{{ secondsToHumanTime(time) }}
Back
Forward
{{ Math.round(speed * 100) / 100 }}x
{{ secondsToHumanTime(duration) }}
close
New speaker
Add speaker
close
Edit speaker
Save changes
close
Share Transcript