Rhetoric and Responsibility in ICE-Related Use-of-Force (Full Transcript)

Leaders clash over ICE actions, local partnerships, and claims that federal conduct undermines safety while local police are praised for constitutional policing.
Download Transcript (DOCX)
Speakers
add Add new speaker

[00:00:00] Speaker 1: You know how many shootings we've had so far this year? Two, and one of them was ICE. Two shootings in a large city so far this entire year, and one of them is ICE. This is a safe city. ICE and Kristi Noem and everything they're doing is making it far less safe. I want you to respond to what she said about you telling ICE to get the F out.

[00:00:21] Speaker 2: We'd love to have the partnership of Mayor Frey. We'd love to have the partnership of the chief of police and of Governor Walz every day when we're out there to make sure they tone down the rhetoric and they do the right thing for the people of Minnesota.

[00:00:32] Speaker 1: Does your rhetoric need to change? Yeah, yeah, I said this was a federal agent recklessly using power that ended up in somebody dying because that was a federal agent recklessly using power that ended up in somebody dying. It's exactly what happened. I mean, am I biased in this? Of course, and I'm biased because I got two eyes. Anybody can see these videos. Anybody can see that this victim is not a domestic terrorist. I mean, my goodness, she's like doing a three or a four or five-point turn. This looks like somebody that's trying to get out of there. If doing a three-point turn or a four-point turn is a domestic terrorist, then my wife is a criminal every single day. This, it does not make sense. I support our law enforcement. Our police officers in Minneapolis are doing an incredible job. I am so proud to work with them. I was the guy, by the way, that stood up against defunding the police back when it was hard five years ago, and these honorable officers that have stayed and that have come on have been incredible. By the way, community members that have traditionally been pretty critical of law enforcement officers are supporting our police. They have kept people safe. They have done right. They have abided by the Constitution, which is a massive juxtaposition against what we've seen from some of these ICE agents, and yeah, no, they have my support.

ai AI Insights
Summary
A discussion about public safety and rhetoric around ICE actions in a large city. Speaker 1 claims the city has had only two shootings this year, one involving ICE, arguing federal actions and officials like Kristi Noem are making the city less safe and asking for a response to telling ICE to leave. Speaker 2 says they want partnership with local leaders (mayor, police chief, governor) and asks them to tone down rhetoric and do right by Minnesotans. Speaker 1 defends their rhetoric, asserting a federal agent acted recklessly and caused a death, saying video shows the victim was trying to leave and not a “domestic terrorist.” They emphasize support for Minneapolis police, note they opposed defunding the police, and argue local police follow the Constitution unlike some ICE agents.
Title
Debate Over ICE Conduct, Rhetoric, and Public Safety
Keywords
ICE Remove
public safety Remove
shootings Remove
rhetoric Remove
Minneapolis Remove
Mayor Frey Remove
Governor Walz Remove
Kristi Noem Remove
law enforcement Remove
Constitution Remove
use of force Remove
domestic terrorism Remove
Enter your query
Sentiments
Negative: The tone is tense and accusatory, focusing on alleged reckless federal conduct leading to death and criticism of ICE; while there is praise for local police, the dominant emotional cues are anger, frustration, and concern about safety and accountability.
Quizzes
Question 1:
What does Speaker 1 cite to argue the city is currently safe?
A large drop in car thefts
Only two shootings so far this year, one involving ICE
A new police funding measure
Increased ICE presence reducing crime
Correct Answer:
Only two shootings so far this year, one involving ICE

Question 2:
What partnership does Speaker 2 say they would like to have?
With federal courts
With Mayor Frey, the police chief, and Governor Walz
With Kristi Noem only
With community groups instead of police
Correct Answer:
With Mayor Frey, the police chief, and Governor Walz

Question 3:
How does Speaker 1 describe the video evidence regarding the victim?
It shows the victim attacking agents
It shows the victim calmly surrendering
It shows the victim attempting to leave via a three- to five-point turn
It shows no relevant context
Correct Answer:
It shows the victim attempting to leave via a three- to five-point turn

Question 4:
What stance does Speaker 1 take on Minneapolis police?
They should be defunded
They are doing an incredible job and have support
They are responsible for rising shootings
They should be replaced by federal agents
Correct Answer:
They are doing an incredible job and have support

{{ secondsToHumanTime(time) }}
Back
Forward
{{ Math.round(speed * 100) / 100 }}x
{{ secondsToHumanTime(duration) }}
close
New speaker
Add speaker
close
Edit speaker
Save changes
close
Share Transcript