Which AI Video Model Fits Your Next Video Project? (Full Transcript)

A practical guide to choosing VO 3.1, Hiluoo 2, Kling 2.5, Pixverse V5, Juan 2.2, or Sora 2 based on realism, motion, audio, and budget.
Download Transcript (DOCX)
Speakers
add Add new speaker

[00:00:00] Speaker 1: There are so many AI video models out there right now. Here's how to know which one is right for the video you're making. Need something that looks like it was shot on an actual camera? VO 3.1 is what you want. It generates audio too. What if you're making something where the physics actually matter? Hiluoo 2 is genuinely impressive at this. If your video involves athletic motion, stunts, or anything acrobatic, this is the one. Speaking of sports, Kling Video 2.5 Turbo Pro is built for that. It does camera tracking shots, smooth follows, and dynamic movement better than most. Pixverse V5 balances quality, speed, and cost. If you're making social content, title cards, or anything where just good enough is genuinely good enough, this is your default. Juan 2.2 Turbo is the scrappy option. It's good for realism and dynamic movement without the premium price tag. Sora 2 creates multi-shot videos with synchronized audio. That means scenes that actually connect. Dialogue, sound effects, ambient noise, all generated with the video instead of awkwardly added later. Useful when you need a video that feels like it has actual structure instead of just being one continuous clip. What about animated stuff? Title cards, stylized visuals. Pixverse V5 and VO 3.1 tend to nail the look without overthinking it. If you want something more experimental, Juan 2.2 gives you room to play because it's less rigid about realism. If you want to actually try these models instead of just watching me talk about them, they're all in Descript. Go make something you're proud of.

ai AI Insights
Arow Summary
The speaker compares leading AI video generation models and recommends which to choose based on the project’s needs: realism, physics accuracy, sports motion, balanced quality/speed/cost for social content, budget realism, multi-shot structure with synced audio, or stylized/experimental animation. They note these models are available in Descript for hands-on testing.
Arow Title
How to Choose the Right AI Video Model for Your Project
Arow Keywords
AI video models Remove
video generation Remove
VO 3.1 Remove
Hiluoo 2 Remove
Kling Video 2.5 Turbo Pro Remove
Pixverse V5 Remove
Juan 2.2 Turbo Remove
Sora 2 Remove
realism Remove
physics simulation Remove
sports motion Remove
multi-shot video Remove
synchronized audio Remove
Descript Remove
Arow Key Takeaways
  • Pick VO 3.1 for camera-like realism and built-in audio generation.
  • Use Hiluoo 2 when physical realism (athletic motion, stunts, acrobatics) matters.
  • Choose Kling Video 2.5 Turbo Pro for sports-style camera tracking, smooth follows, and dynamic movement.
  • Default to Pixverse V5 for a strong quality/speed/cost balance, especially for social content and title cards.
  • Consider Juan 2.2 Turbo for budget-friendly realism and dynamic motion, plus more experimental flexibility.
  • Use Sora 2 for multi-shot videos with synchronized dialogue, SFX, and ambience that feel structurally connected.
  • For stylized/animated visuals, Pixverse V5 and VO 3.1 are reliable; Juan 2.2 is good for experimentation.
  • All mentioned models can be tried within Descript.
Arow Sentiments
Positive: Upbeat, helpful guidance with confident endorsements of each model’s strengths; ends with an encouraging call to create and try the tools in Descript.
Arow Enter your query
{{ secondsToHumanTime(time) }}
Back
Forward
{{ Math.round(speed * 100) / 100 }}x
{{ secondsToHumanTime(duration) }}
close
New speaker
Add speaker
close
Edit speaker
Save changes
close
Share Transcript