Why Middle Powers Must Unite in Global Negotiations (Full Transcript)

Acting alone, middle powers bargain from weakness with hegemons; collective action boosts leverage and defends real sovereignty in international negotiations.

Download Transcript (DOCX)

Speakers

Add new speaker

[00:00:00] Speaker 1: argue that middle powers must act together because if we're not at the table, we're on the menu. Great powers can afford, for now, to go it alone. They have the market size, the military capacity, and the leverage to dictate terms. Middle powers do not. But when we only negotiate bilaterally with a hegemon, we negotiate from weakness. We accept what's offered. We compete with each other to be the most accommodating. This is not sovereignty. It's the performance of sovereignty while accepting subordination.

Summary

The speaker argues that middle powers should coordinate and act collectively in negotiations with dominant great powers. Great powers can often act unilaterally due to their market size, military capacity, and leverage, but middle powers negotiating bilaterally with a hegemon do so from a position of weakness, end up accepting imposed terms, and compete to be the most accommodating. This dynamic, the speaker contends, is not true sovereignty but a facade of sovereignty that masks subordination.

Copy

Download

Title

Middle powers need collective leverage against hegemons

Copy

Download

Keywords

middle powers Remove

Remove

great powers Remove

Remove

hegemony

Remove

collective action Remove

Remove

bilateral negotiations Remove

Remove

sovereignty Remove

Remove

leverage

Remove

international relations Remove

Remove

power asymmetry Remove

Remove

multilateralism Remove

Remove

Copy

Download

Key Takeaways

Middle powers lack the unilateral leverage that great powers possess.
Bilateral negotiations with a hegemon tend to disadvantage middle powers.
Without coordination, middle powers compete against one another to appease the dominant power.
Collective bargaining among middle powers can increase leverage and reduce subordination.
Accepting imposed terms while claiming autonomy amounts to performative sovereignty, not real sovereignty.

Copy

Download

Sentiments

Negative: The tone is critical and cautionary, emphasizing vulnerability, weakness in bilateral talks, and the loss or performance of sovereignty under hegemonic pressure.

Copy

Download

Enter your query

{{ secondsToHumanTime(time) }}

Back

Forward

{{ Math.round(speed * 100) / 100 }}x

{{ secondsToHumanTime(duration) }}

Select Audio file