Why Middle Powers Must Unite in Global Negotiations (Full Transcript)
[00:00:00] Speaker 1: argue that middle powers must act together because if we're not at the table, we're on the menu. Great powers can afford, for now, to go it alone. They have the market size, the military capacity, and the leverage to dictate terms. Middle powers do not. But when we only negotiate bilaterally with a hegemon, we negotiate from weakness. We accept what's offered. We compete with each other to be the most accommodating. This is not sovereignty. It's the performance of sovereignty while accepting subordination.
- Middle powers lack the unilateral leverage that great powers possess.
- Bilateral negotiations with a hegemon tend to disadvantage middle powers.
- Without coordination, middle powers compete against one another to appease the dominant power.
- Collective bargaining among middle powers can increase leverage and reduce subordination.
- Accepting imposed terms while claiming autonomy amounts to performative sovereignty, not real sovereignty.