Comparing CSS Flame Animations: DeepSeek vs ChatGPT
Explore the differences in CSS flame animations created by ChatGPT and DeepSeek. See how DeepSeek offers better realism, flame size, and additional sparks.
File
Did you try deepseek China deepseek ai deepseek chatgpt
Added on 01/29/2025
Speakers
add Add new speaker

Speaker 1: I asked DeepSeek and ChatGPT to create a CSS flame animation and the difference was insane. First, let's start with ChatGPT. I wrote a prompt asking for a white candle with an animated flame and sparks. After running the code, we can see the flame is really small compared to the candle size. The sparks are missing and the flame's motion is far from realistic. Now let's paste the same prompt into DeepSeek. After running the code, we can see a much better result. The flame size and animation movement look more realistic and the sparks are finally there. I also really like the flame's gradient colors and the outer shadow effect. It gives the animation a nice touch.

ai AI Insights
Summary

Generate a brief summary highlighting the main points of the transcript.

Generate
Title

Generate a concise and relevant title for the transcript based on the main themes and content discussed.

Generate
Keywords

Identify and highlight the key words or phrases most relevant to the content of the transcript.

Generate
Enter your query
Sentiments

Analyze the emotional tone of the transcript to determine whether the sentiment is positive, negative, or neutral.

Generate
Quizzes

Create interactive quizzes based on the content of the transcript to test comprehension or engage users.

Generate
{{ secondsToHumanTime(time) }}
Back
Forward
{{ Math.round(speed * 100) / 100 }}x
{{ secondsToHumanTime(duration) }}
close
New speaker
Add speaker
close
Edit speaker
Save changes
close
Share Transcript